Countries in this Region

	ISO2	ISO3	ISO3 Number
Angola	AO	AGO	24
Antigua and Barbuda	AG	ATG	28
Bahamas	BS	BHS	44
Barbados	BB	BRB	52
Belize	BZ	BLZ	84
Benin	BJ	BEN	204
Botswana	BW	BWA	72
Burkina Faso	BF	BFA	854
Burundi	BI	BDI	108
Cameroon	CM	CMR	120
Cape Verde	CV	CPV	132
Central African Republic	CF	CAF	140
Chad	TD	TCD	148
Comoros	KM	COM	174
Congo	CG	COG	178
Cook Islands	CK	COK	184
Côte d'Ivoire	CI	CIV	384
Cuba	CU	CUB	192
Democratic Republic of the Congo	CD	COD	180
Djibouti	DJ	DJI	262
Dominica	DM	DMA	212
Dominican Republic	DO	DOM	214
Equatorial Guinea	GQ	GNQ	226
Eritrea	ER	ERI	232
Eswatini	SZ	SWZ	748
Ethiopia	ET	ETH	231
Fiji	FJ	FJI	242
Gabon	GA	GAB	266
Gambia	GM	GMB	270
Ghana	GH	GHA	288
Grenada	GD	GRD	308
Guinea	GN	GIN	324
Guinea-Bissau	GW	GNB	624
Guyana	GY	GUY	328
Haiti	HT	HTI	332
Jamaica	JM	JAM	388
Kenya	KE	KEN	404
Kiribati	KI	KIR	296
Lesotho	LS	LSO	426
Liberia	LR	LBR	430
Madagascar	MG	MDG	450
Malawi	MW	MWI	454
Mali	ML	MLI	466
Marshall Islands	MH	MHL	584
Mauritania	MR	MRT	478
Mauritius	MU	MUS	480
Micronesia (Federated States of)	FM	FSM	583
Mozambique	MZ	MOZ	508
Namibia	NA	NAM	516
Nauru	NR	NRU	520
Niger	NE	NER
Nigeria	NG	NGA
Niue	NU	NIU	570
Palau	PW	PLW	585
Papua New Guinea	PG	PNG	598
Rwanda	RW	RWA	646
Saint Kitts and Nevis	KN	KNA	659
Saint Lucia	LC	LCA	662
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	VC	VCT	670
Samoa	WS	WSM	882
Sao Tome and Principe	ST	STP	678
Senegal	SN	SEN	686
Seychelles	SC	SYC	690
Sierra Leone	SL	SLE	694
Solomon Islands	SB	SLB	90
Somalia	SO	SOM	706
South Africa	ZA	ZAF	710
South Sudan	SS	SSD	728
Sudan	SD	SDN	736
Suriname	SR	SUR	740
Timor-Leste	TL	TLS	626
Togo	TG	TGO	768
Tonga	TO	TON	776
Trinidad and Tobago	TT	TTO	780
Tuvalu	TV	TUV	798
Uganda	UG	UGA	800
United Republic of Tanzania	TZ	TZA	834
Vanuatu	VU	VUT	548
Zambia	ZM	ZMB	894
Zimbabwe	ZW	ZWE	716

State Indicators

State Description

State indicators reflect the conditions of the land as well as its resilience to withstand change as a consequence of sector pressures. This may include indicators which express changes in biological productivity (actual and potential), extent and impacts of soil degradation, including erosion, salinization, etc., annual and long-term balance of nutrients (exported and imported by the cropping systems), degree and type of contamination or pollution (by direct application, atmospheric transport, etc.), changes in organic matter content, water holding capacity, etc. The changes in state may be negative with poor management, or positive with good management. © FAO Link

No indicators yet

Pressure Indicators

Pressure Description

Indicators in this group include those activities that relate to the degree of intensification and diversification of agricultural land uses, and result in increased pressure on land quality. This may include the number of crops in a cropping system per year or per hectare, type and intensity of tillage, degree of removal of biomass, integration with livestock systems, number of food and fibre products produced annually, etc. These indicators must be seen within the context of major socio-demographic factors such as population pressures, land tenure, etc., but the latter do not qualify for inclusion as LQIs. This is because these major forces do not influence land quality directly, but rather through the land practices that are adopted by farmers as a consequence. It is these management systems and their impacts that we wish to capture as LQIs, although changes in the major driving forces may provide some "early warning" signals. © FAO Link

No indicators yet

Response Indicators

Response Description

The response mechanisms are normally achieved through direct actions by the farmers themselves in evolving or adopting improved land management systems, or through complementary activities whereby adoption of conservation technologies is stimulated by general economic, agricultural and conservation policies and programmes. In rare instances, environmental regulations may be necessary to effect proper control of land resource degradation. Response indicators may include number and types of farmer organizations for soil conservation, extent of change in farm technologies, risk management strategies, incentive programmes for adoption of conservation technologies, etc. Response indicators should be distinguished into those categories promoted by governments, those undertaken by individual farmers and those supported by agri-business. © FAO Link

Global
Regional
National
Local

Marine coverage statistics by protected areas

Progresses towards Nature Needs Half by ecoregions

Restoring opportunities for ecoregions

Terrestrial and Marine coverage statistics by protected areas

Terrestrial coverage statistics by protected areas

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Since 2002, an increasing number of protected areas have been involved in the project. In fact, all MIKE sites but one overlap, either entirely or partly, with protected areas included in the World Database of Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC).

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

In Central Africa, 16 designated MIKE sites entirely overlap with protected areas. In Western Africa, 17 out of 18 designated MIKE sites entirely overlap with protected areas, only one site (Nazinga Gamme Ranch) is not included in the World Database of Protected Areas. In Eastern Africa (EA), 16 designated MIKE sites overlap with 67 protected areas. In Southern Africa, 18 designated MIKE sites overlap with 33 protected areas.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

The CITES Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants (MIKE) Programme and the follow up project Minimizing the Illegal Killing of Elephants and other Endangered Species (MIKES) have maintained a site-based system designed to monitor trends in the illegal killing of elephants, build management capacity and provide information to help range States make appropriate management and enforcement decisions.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nyr_rep,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Series data

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Series data

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Series data

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Series data

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

{ "id": "MIKE_sites_gen", "type": "raster", "source": { "type": "raster", "tiles": [ "https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?bbox={bbox-epsg-3857}&service=WMS&request=GetMap&layers=MIKE_sites_gen&format=image%2Fpng&transparent=true&version=1.1.1&height=256&width=256&srs=EPSG%3A3857" ], "tileSize": 256 }, "paint": {} }

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Series data

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Series data

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Series data

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Series data

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme V: N of CARCASSES

MIKE programme II: Protected areas in MIKE programme

African Elephant Action Plan

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

In the map, protected areas included in MIKE programme are classified by the number of annual reports delivered to the programme.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

wdpaid

WDPAID

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"Year", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Series data

{"name":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Years of reporting by protected area in MIKE programme", "data":"nyr_rep"}

Descending

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Equal Interval

sequential-11

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CPV, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE

18748

MIKE programme IV: Illegal Killing (PIKE) by protected area

African Elephant Action Plan

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

This indicator was generally higher in Central and Southern Africa then in Western and Eastern.

Please note that protected areas included in the same MIKE site share the same statistic.

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=wfs&version=1.1.0&request=getfeature&MAXFEATURES=9999&typename=biopama:wdpa_PIKE_tot&PROPERTYNAME=wdpaid,name,nrmpike_av,Region,&CQL_FILTER=Region='REGION'&outputFormat=application/json

wdpaid

WDPAID

MIKE sites boundaries

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/ows?service=WMS&request=GetLegendGraphic&format=image%2Fpng&width=20&height=20&layer=MIKE_sites_gen

{"name":"Protected area", "show": true, "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"category", "data":"name"}

{"name":"nPIKE", "nameLocation": "middle", "nameGap": 80, "type":"value", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Series data

{"name":"Normalised Average PIKE", "type":"bar", "bp_count":"Normalised Average PIKE", "data":"nrmpike_av"}

Descending

Yes

REST

features

https://geospatial.jrc.ec.europa.eu/geoserver/biopama/wms?

Quantile

diverging-6

CMR, CAF, TCD, COG, COD, GNQ, GAB, BEN, BFA, CIV, GHA, GIN, LBR, NER, NGA, SEN, TGO, ERI, ETH, KEN, RWA, UGA, TZA, AGO, BWA, MWI, MOZ, NAM, ZAF, ZMB, ZWE, MLI

18729

MIKE programme V: N of CARCASSES

No indicators yet

Protected Area Solutions

These solutions are provided by the PANORAMA – Solutions for a Healthy Planet initiative and are published on the PANORAMA web platform.

Documents (e.g. Regional Assessments, Strategies, Policies)

Document	Document Type	Publication year
Document: Assessment of Management Effectiveness for Papua New Guinea’s Protected Areas (2017)	Site-level assessment, National assessment	2017
URL: Coral Sea Natural Park, New Caledonia, Management Plan 2017-2021	Management Plan	2016
Document: East Rennell, Solomon Islands: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
URL: How to conduct a Protected Areas Management Effectiveness Assessment Document: How to conduct a Protected Areas Management Effectiveness Assessment	Manual / Methodology / Standard / Tool	2021
URL: Ngarchelong Marine Managed Area, Palau, Management Plan 2012 – 2017 Document: Ngarchelong Marine Managed Area, Palau, Management Plan 2012 – 2017	Management Plan	2012
Document: Phoenix Islands Protected Area, Kiribati: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
URL: Research priorities for conservation and natural resource management in Oceania's small‐island developing states	Scientific paper	2017
Document: Rock Islands Southern Lagoon, Palau: IUCN World Heritage Conservation Outlook Assessment 2020	Site-level assessment	2020
URL: Size, age, and habitat determine effectiveness of Palau's Marine Protected Areas	Scientific paper	2017
URL: The National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan for Timor-Leste (2011-2020)	NBSAP	2015

You might also be interested in other regions:

Countries in this Region

State Indicators

State Description

Pressure Indicators

Pressure Description

Response Indicators

Response Description

This map shows the percentage of imperiled ecoregions that are not protected out of the total present in each country.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Protected Areas in MIKE programme

Reporting period of protected areas in the MIKE programme.

Percentage of Illegal Killing of Elephants (PIKE) by protected areas in MIKE programme.

Normalised Average of the Percentage of Illegal Killings of Elephants (PIKE) over the reporting period, by protected area in the CITES MIKE programme in the selected region.

Total number of elephant carcasses reported in MIKE programme over the monitoring period.

Protected Area Solutions

Documents (e.g. Regional Assessments, Strategies, Policies)

SIGN IN TO BIOPAMA

Enter your details below.